FOLLOW-ON INVESTMENT: Volition Capital Announces Meaningful Follow-On Investment in Creatio  Read More

NEW INVESTMENT: Volition Capital Invests $10.5M in Screenverse  Read More

VOLITION NEWS: Melanie Jordan Named to List of Top Women Leaders in Growth Investing  Read More

VOLITION MEDIA: Investor Roundtable 2024  Read More

6 MIN READ

Paul Melchiorre: When to Prioritize a Channel Partner Sales Model

Pictured: Paul Melchiorre, SAB Member at Volition Capital

Over the years, I have received countless questions on best practices in sales and go-to-market strategy. Today, I wanted to spend some time answering one of the most important ones that I feel is particularly pressing in the current macro-economic landscape: When does it make sense to build an internal sales operation versus leveraging a channel partner model?

Particularly, this is a question I am being asked frequently now. If you are stressing over this question, you are not alone. Companies are feeling the pressure to not only grow but grow fast. In a macro-economic environment like this, sales are needed earlier to drive towards profitability faster and increase your chances to raise capital if necessary. In a higher interest rate environment, you will be hard-pressed to raise multiple meaningful rounds of capital without promising revenue matching your burn rate.

Feeling this pressure, many founders who are prioritizing building a direct sales model earlier, have underestimated just how hard it is to do. The infrastructure of a strong sales organization cannot just be built with the snap of a finger. You have to hire sales leaders, the right SDRs, train them, there is a ramp-up period, and there will also be turnover too. Also, there is no guarantee that the professionals you hire – at each level – are the right hires and will hit their quotas consistently. These challenges are only further exacerbated when looking at the enterprise sales space. 

In an effort to circumvent some of these challenges, a great strategy can be to work with channel partners to create a sell-with, sell-through, or an embed model. Especially at the enterprise stage, being part of a channel partner program with a large enterprise can give you access to sizable contracts that you otherwise would not have had access to as a smaller, yet rapidly growing company. These enterprises have been selling consistently to companies for 20+ years and there is a brand name and reliability that will be hard to replicate on your own.

At the surface, there will appear to be a “downside” to using a channel sales model by having to give up 20-30% of your margin to the partner. However, there are a couple questions you should ask yourself when worrying about this tradeoff. 

One, as I mentioned a moment ago, would you even have had access to these deals in the first place if it wasn’t for the channel partner? Two, what other areas are you saving meaningful costs in by pursuing the channel model? You will likely be saving a sizable chunk of change when it comes to hiring/paying FTEs as well as spending less on marketing. Additionally, you can also save meaningful time and money on the implementation and support of your product by having your channel partner lead these efforts. As I like to say, always remember to think about the entire picture.

Arguably, the most logical area to pursue a channel partner sales model is when looking at the international markets. For many companies, it does not make sense to try and learn a new market and establish operations in regions like Latin America, Middle East, Japan, etc. Finding a great partner to work with to either JV or form a partnership with can be a great way to bring in additional revenue without driving up costs and losing focus.

One last thing that I wanted to touch on today is how can you identify the right channel partner. Off the bat, ask yourself where the alignment is between what you are doing and what the channel partners are doing. Yes, there can be benefit to you being another one of 5,000 vendors on a given platform from a revenue perspective. 

However, the best channel partnerships come from when both companies identify a strong overlap and value add for each other and build off of this to become a preferred, differentiated resource. This is where the real magic can happen. Like any area in life, most one-sided relationships do not end well and it is important to make sure that is not the case with your channel partner. 

Finally, you should avoid “press release relationships” where there is no tangible benefit operationally, but rather just a marketing win. Of course, they do not cost you anything but there is no value. Always drive your sales organization towards the north star which is sales and revenue.

For companies at earlier stages of growing their business, these concepts might not yet sound relevant. In some ways this is true as the most successful businesses often times find themselves growing through a founder led sales model. However, in these earlier stages, a founder should be keeping a keen eye on what market procedures are working, what policies are working, what enablement capabilities are working, etc. so when it is time to work with a direct channel partner, your product is ready to roll. To put it clearly, you should be thinking about channel sales partnerships from day one as it will be a critical component to ultimately becoming the scaled company you want to be.

 -Paul Melchiorre

Do you want to connect with Paul Melchiorre? Check out his Linkedin profile here

Disclaimer

This information is provided for general informational purposes only.  Under no circumstances should this information be used in connection with or be considered an offer, solicitation of an offer, or a recommendation to purchase or sell, any securities, nor does any such material constitute investment, legal, accounting or tax advice or an endorsement with respect to any investment strategy or company.  

This information may include forward-looking statements.  Volition Capital LLC (“Volition,” “we,” or “us”) can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.  Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results.  Any specific companies listed or discussed are for illustrative purposes only, and do not represent any or all companies purchased, sold or recommended or an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services.  

Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas are not guaranteed to be accurate.  Volition does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any of this information, and Volition takes no responsibility therefor.  

Volition has no obligation to update, modify or amend any such information or to notify you in the event that any information, opinion, projection, forecast or estimate changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.  The views expressed herein are those of the individuals quoted or named and are not the views of Volition Capital LLC or its affiliates. 

This information is not directed at nor intended for use by any investors or prospective investors, and may not under any circumstances be relied upon when making a decision to invest in any fund managed by Volition.

Volition Capital

Paul Melchiorre

(Former) CRO | Anaplan

Paul Melchiorre

(Former) CRO | Anaplan

Paul Melchiorre is an independent director at R3, an enterprise blockchain technology company, and was previously an independent director at Scout RFP, a sourcing and procurement software company that was acquired by Workday (NASDAQ: WDAY). He also sits on the board of nonprofit Spark.Org. Previously, Paul served as Global Customer Officer and Chief Revenue Officer … Continued

ALL ARTICLES
BACK TO TOP

Consent(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Consent(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Consent(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Consent(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.